For his latest, Wim Wenders directs James McAvoy and Alicia Vikander in romantic drama Submergence - a film with arrives with lots of fascinating ideas and potential but one that, sadly, drowns upon arrival.


Whilst holed up in a hotel in France, Scottish spy James More (McAvoy) meets a professor, Danny Flinders (Vikander), and the pair instantly hit it off and quickly fall in love, desperate to see each other after their trips – More is off to disguise himself as a British aid worker in Somalia for a mission, whilst Flinders is preparing to embark on a mission of her own: to the bottom of the ocean, in the hopes of discovering new lifeforms. However, when the former is kidnapped by terrorists, the latter is left waiting for a message from her newfound lover, unaware of his predicament, and finding trouble of her own beneath the Greenland Sea during her dive.

To start off with the good: Wenders’ latest is certainly shot nicely. It utilises a myriad of locations, each captured beautifully – from the sweeping depths of the ocean to the sun-scorched landscapes of Somalia. Benoit Debie’s cinematography is crisp and slick. The film is also capably performed too; Vikander and McAvoy are both strong individual talents and they’re good with what they have here. There is also good work from the supporting cast too, notably Celyn Jones and Alexander Siddig. However, that’s where the pros end abruptly. I really wanted to love this film; I'm a big fan of all the talent on-board this project and it had a lot of potential to be a very gripping, investing and nuanced romance and character-piece. Sadly, it's anything but. Yes, the performances are commendable. But the chemistry between this cast – or lack thereof – is poor. For a film about a romance to work, we need to invest in the central romance and to do that, we need to believe it. But it’s hard to believe the romance when Vikander and McAvoy don’t sell that aspect at all – their relationship feels so contrived. It's inorganic and dull to watch.

Furthermore, the writing itself is just truly horrendous. The dialogue is stilted and often cringe-worthy; it’s the kind of conversations and writing that you would expect from someone that has never written anything before – unrealistic, unusual, just bad. Because of how mawkish the screenplay is, it means that characterisation is also awful; both Flinders and More are as paper-thin as characters can come, we don’t care for them or their stories at all which leaves Submergence feeling very flat and boring. Sadly, in the second act, when the stories separate, the film bites off more than it can chew and tries juggling so many more themes and ideas and genres than it already has on its plate (that it is already struggling with) – it tries to be part-espionage; part-terrorism commentary; part-underwater-sci-fi; all whilst trying to be a good love story too. There’s too much going on and such poor writing realising it all that the film fails to work on any single front and becomes frustratingly bland. Wenders tries to tell an investing love-story. However, it’s just not god. Submergence, despite its efforts, doesn't work. With no actual substance or heart or depth to it, this is a sour affair that leaves a horrible taste in the mouth.


Submergence drowns upon arrival.

Tagged as

About the Author

Awais Irfan
Founder of Oasis Awais, and avid lover of life, Awais Irfan's love of writing and film is unequivocal. Ever since he was a little kid, he has loved the cinematic experience; so much so, he is studying Film Production in Glasgow and hopes to be the next "big thing" in directing.

Related Posts